political igit, secondly, to take electoral advantage of our fears by the designation of all our ills. Yesterday, the Jew, today the "underground."
Of course, I sympathize with this interpretation of things. Unless one is a rabbit transfixed by the lights of the car, may well anticipate the purpose of these unscrupulous jerks. However, I know to add that his ideology is not merely occasional. Is constitutive of his being, believe it, and this makes them even more convincing. In France, one can be a nationalist in the manner of those with the surnamelime: Duchesne, Dupont, Dupuis, Lapierre, Lafitte, Besson, Lesage ... These feel as Indians, Argelianos, Cameroonians, with the arrival of Vietnamese settlers. But there are the new rich who were initially poor, those that "went black" to be accepted and that "adding tons" to show that "they deserve it." For years, the presidents of this country were bald and called De Gaulle, Pompidou, Giscard d'Estaing, Mitterrand, Chirac, but in the last election, was heard: "What progress! For the first time we put a name metic hairy at the polls and wins. "Stop! Here, what has changedor is not the way of thinking, is the population. And Gallo, Finkielkraut, Hidalgo, Fernandez, Platini, Zidane, are not highlighted in red on my auto-correction.
Therefore, to resume its mission, the scarecrow is disguised this time as a migrant "integrated", sorry, good family and did not eat anyone's bread. Therefore, the great preacher of xenophobic nationalism is a second generation carrying a name of another party, which makes many efforts to convince (him) that, despite an illegal father and a mother Sephardic origin may lie drinks with well-heeled French and Pinault, Lagardère, Bouyguplaced by a minister and a president arrogant self-conscious is no more than the loincloth of a more concrete problems where the question is not what it means to "be French" but find requirements to become one ... or remain so.
